Decision conversations are the most rehearsed thing people bring to a reading. By the time you've called me, you've already constructed the logical argument for both sides — you've practiced which version sounds more reasonable, which one you lead with. I'm blind. I can't see which framing you're leaning on, which case you've rehearsed harder. What I read is the actual weight behind each option — whether the hesitation is fear of change, a genuine signal that something is wrong, or the answer you already have but haven't been able to say out loud yet.
Four things that go deeper than the argument you've already built for each option.
Reads whether the hesitation is fear or a real signal
Fear of change and genuine misalignment feel similar from the inside — both create resistance, both make you second-guess. They're energetically different. One has movement underneath it, just blocked. The other is flat in a way that doesn't open up when you push. A reading can tell which one you're dealing with.
Identifies the pattern underneath the decision
If the same decision keeps circling — the same type of job, the same kind of relationship, the same crossroads in a different form — there's usually a pattern underneath it that goes deeper than this particular choice. I read what's driving the recurrence: what's unresolved, what you keep testing yourself against, what you haven't been willing to name yet.
Reads the energy of each path
Some paths have movement — there's something alive and open in the direction, even if it's uncertain or uncomfortable. Others feel flat or forced, held by obligation or fear or habit rather than anything that's actually pulling you toward them. I can read which is which. That's often more useful than another round of pros and cons.
Finds what you already know but haven't said yet
Most people at a decision crossroads already know what they want. What they don't trust is whether they're allowed to want it, whether it's the right reason, whether the knowing is real. The reading doesn't hand you information — it cuts through the noise and names what's already there. That's usually what shifts things.
Decision conversations are the most prepared conversations people bring into a reading. By the time someone calls me, they've already built the case for both options — the pros and cons list, the version that sounds responsible, the version that sounds brave. They've rehearsed which framing sounds more reasonable, which one holds up under pressure, which one they lead with when they're trying to convince themselves. I was born blind — I have no read on which one you're leaning toward, which version you practiced in the shower that morning, which case you're selling harder. I don't have access to the performance. I read the actual weight behind each option, and that's a different thing from the argument for each option.
Most decision paralysis isn't a lack of information. It's a conflict between what the right answer is and what feels safe, acceptable, or allowed. Those are two different forces, and they pull in different directions — and when they do, people get stuck, going around the same loop without being able to land anywhere. Energy makes that visible. I can read which path has genuine movement and which one is being held out of obligation, fear, habit, or someone else's expectation of who you should be. That distinction is usually the thing that's been missing from every conversation you've already had about this.
I won't tell you what to do. That's not what the reading is for. What I do is cut through the rehearsed versions — the prepared arguments, the logical cases, the versions you've shaped for other people — and tell you what's actually present underneath all of it. Most people who come in for decision readings already know. What they need is to hear their own knowing without all the noise sitting on top of it. That's what a reading does. It doesn't add information. It removes interference.
Readings are available by text chat or phone. Decisions usually need enough room to read both sides of the pull — a 15–25 min text session or a 10–15 min phone call tends to give the right amount of space for that.
Text Chat Reading
Written, at your pace — good if you need to lay it out in your own words
Write out where you're stuck. I'll read both sides of the pull and respond with what I'm picking up — what's driving the hesitation, which path has movement. Good if you need to lay it out in your own words without interruption.
$20 – $75
Learn More →Phone Reading
Good for decisionsReal-time, live — think out loud and move through both sides together
A live conversation. You can ask follow-up questions as things come up and we can move through both sides of the decision together in real time. Good when you want to think out loud rather than write it all out first.
$40 – $190
Learn More →Not sure yet?
Start with a Single Card Pull — $15. One focused question, one honest read. A low-stakes way to see what a reading actually feels like before committing to something longer.
| Reading | Price |
|---|---|
| Single Card Intuitive Pull | $15 |
| 10-Min Intro Text Chat★ Intro Offer | $20 |
| 5-Min Text Chat | $20 |
| 10-Min Text Chat | $35 |
| 15-Min Text Chat | $50 |
| 25-Min Text Chat | $75 |
| 10-Min Phone Reading | $40 |
| 15-Min Phone Reading | $60 |
| 30-Min Psychic Reading | $110 |
| Full Soul Reading 60 Min | $190 |
For decision readings, the 15–25 min text range or a 10–15 min phone call gives enough room to read both sides of the pull and what's underneath it.
Being stuck at a crossroads isn't about not knowing enough — it's about not being able to trust which voice inside you is telling the truth. A reading won't make the choice for you, but it'll clear the noise so you can actually hear what you already know.
Book a Reading